BI Governance
BI Governance Framework
BI Governance Framework
Core components of an effective BI governance program
Legend
Components
Connection Types
Governance Operating Model
BI Governance Models
The governance model directly impacts business value delivery:
- Centralized models improve consistency but may create bottlenecks
- Federated models increase responsiveness but risk inconsistency
- Hybrid models balance control and flexibility for most organizations
- Self-service models accelerate insights but require strong guardrails
- Project models align analytics with specific business outcomes
BI Governance Models
Technical implementation of governance models:
- Centralized model with standardized processes and tools
- Federated model with distributed teams and shared standards
- Hybrid model with central CoE and distributed power users
- Self-service model with guardrails and certification
- Project-based model for specific business initiatives
BI Governance Team Structure
Center of Excellence (CoE) Approach
Role | Primary Responsibilities |
---|---|
BI Governance Lead | Overall strategy, standards, and program management |
Data Stewards | Subject matter expertise, metadata management, quality assurance |
BI Platform Administrators | Security configuration, permissions, platform management |
BI Developers | Enterprise content creation, data model development |
Data Quality Specialists | Data profiling, quality monitoring, remediation |
Training Specialists | User education, documentation, knowledge base |
Federated Governance Approach
Team | Responsibilities |
---|---|
Central Governance Team | Standards, core infrastructure, centralized templates |
Line of Business Teams | Department-specific content, local data expertise |
Technical Services | Platform support, integrations, security coordination |
Cross-Functional Committee | Priority setting, resource allocation, conflict resolution |
Policies and Standards
Governance Policies
Effective governance policies deliver tangible business benefits:
- Ensure consistency and reliability across business analytics
- Reduce duplication of effort and conflicting reports
- Establish clear expectations for analytics quality
- Balance innovation with controls for regulatory compliance
- Create sustainable analytics practices that scale with the business
Governance Policies
Technical implementation of governance policies:
- Naming conventions enforced through validation rules
- Content certification workflows and approval gates
- Change management procedures with version control
- Development, testing, and production environments
- Automated policy enforcement through platform tools
Sample BI Governance Policies Document
# Business Intelligence Governance Policies
## 1. Content Development & Management
### 1.1 Naming Conventions
- All dashboards must follow pattern: [Department]-[Purpose]-[Frequency] (e.g., "Sales-Pipeline-Weekly")
- Reports must include owner and last update information
- Standardized prefixes for certified (C_) vs. development (DEV_) content
### 1.2 Content Certification Process
- Development content must be reviewed by subject matter expert
- Data accuracy must be validated against source systems
- Business relevance must be confirmed by business owner
- Documentation must be complete before certification
- Re-certification required quarterly or after major data changes
### 1.3 Change Management
- Major changes require documented business requirements
- Testing mandatory in development environment
- User acceptance testing with documented results
- Scheduled deployment windows for production changes
- Post-implementation review for significant changes
## 2. Data Standards
### 2.1 Metric Definitions
- Enterprise metrics must use approved calculation methodology
- Local metrics must be clearly identified as non-standard
- All calculations must be documented in central repository
- Standard time periods and fiscal calendars must be used
- Currency conversions must use approved exchange rates
### 2.2 Data Quality
- Critical reports must include data quality indicators
- Data lineage must be documented for compliance-related reporting
- Known data limitations must be documented
- Automated data quality checks for critical metrics
- Data refresh schedules must be documented and monitored
## 3. Security & Access
### 3.1 Access Controls
- Access based on role and data sensitivity classification
- Quarterly access reviews required
- PII/sensitive data requires additional approval
- External sharing requires business owner authorization
- Administrator access limited to governance team
### 3.2 Data Protection
- Sensitive data must be identified and classified
- Export controls enforced for confidential information
- Embedding in external applications requires security review
- Mobile access requires appropriate security controls
- Audit logging enabled for sensitive content access
Metadata Management
Metadata Strategy
Effective metadata management delivers substantial business value:
- Creates a shared business vocabulary across the organization
- Improves discovery and reuse of analytics assets
- Enables impact analysis for proposed changes
- Builds trust through transparency of data sources and transformations
- Accelerates onboarding of new analytics users and developers
Metadata Strategy
Technical implementation of metadata management:
- Business glossary integration with BI semantic layer
- Metadata repository implementation with APIs
- Automated lineage capture and documentation
- Technical and business metadata association
- Metadata-driven automation for documentation
Metadata Management Architecture
Key components of an enterprise metadata management system for BI
Legend
Components
Connection Types
Security and Compliance
BI Security Model
A robust BI security model delivers key business protections:
- Ensures sensitive information is only visible to authorized users
- Maintains compliance with industry regulations and privacy laws
- Reduces risk of data leakage and unauthorized access
- Enables safe data sharing with partners and customers
- Supports data democratization while maintaining proper controls
BI Security Model
Technical implementation of BI security:
- Row-level security with dynamic user-based filters
- Column-level security for sensitive attributes
- Object-level permissions for content access control
- Integration with enterprise authentication systems
- Audit logging and monitoring for security events
Row-Level Security Implementation Example
-- 1. Create security tables
CREATE TABLE user_roles (
user_id VARCHAR(50),
role_id VARCHAR(50),
PRIMARY KEY (user_id, role_id)
);
CREATE TABLE role_permissions (
role_id VARCHAR(50),
region_id VARCHAR(50),
department_id VARCHAR(50),
PRIMARY KEY (role_id, region_id, department_id)
);
-- 2. Create security view that filters data based on user context
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW sales_secure AS
SELECT s.*
FROM sales s
JOIN role_permissions rp ON
s.region_id = rp.region_id AND
s.department_id = rp.department_id
JOIN user_roles ur ON
rp.role_id = ur.role_id
WHERE
ur.user_id = CURRENT_USER();
-- 3. Tableau/Power BI implementation: Use custom SQL with user functions
-- Tableau example:
-- SELECT * FROM sales s
-- WHERE s.region_id IN (
-- SELECT rp.region_id
-- FROM role_permissions rp
-- JOIN user_roles ur ON rp.role_id = ur.role_id
-- WHERE ur.user_id = USERNAME()
-- )
-- 4. Alternative: Create database users mapped to application users
-- and create appropriate grants
GRANT SELECT ON sales_secure TO ROLE analyst_role;
Platform-Specific Security Features
Tableau Security
- Site roles and user permissions
- Projects for content organization
- Data source certification
- Row-level security via user filters
- OAuth and SAML integration
Power BI Security
- Workspace roles and app permissions
- Row-level security (RLS) with DAX filters
- Object-level security (OLS) for column restrictions
- Sensitivity labels for data classification
- Integration with Microsoft Information Protection
Looker Security
- Model-based access controls
- Content access controls with folders
- Data-level security with access grants
- User attributes for parameterized filtering
- Field-level permissions in LookML
Content Lifecycle Management
BI Content Lifecycle
Stages in the lifecycle of BI content from creation through retirement
Legend
Components
Connection Types
Version Control & Change Management
Effective version control delivers business stability and agility:
- Prevents disruption to business operations during updates
- Creates audit trail of changes for compliance requirements
- Enables rollback capability when issues arise
- Facilitates collaboration among development teams
- Accelerates development through workflow automation
Version Control & Change Management
Technical implementation of version control:
- Git integration for BI content versioning
- CI/CD pipelines for automated deployment
- Staging and production environments
- Version tagging and release notes
- Automated testing for content validation
BI CI/CD Pipeline Example
# Azure DevOps Pipeline for Power BI Deployment
trigger:
branches:
include:
- main
- release/*
pool:
vmImage: 'windows-latest'
stages:
- stage: Build
jobs:
- job: BuildAndTest
steps:
- task: PowerShell@2
inputs:
targetType: 'inline'
script: |
# Install required modules
Install-Module -Name MicrosoftPowerBIMgmt -Force -Scope CurrentUser
Install-Module -Name ALMToolkit -Force -Scope CurrentUser
# Connect to Power BI Service
$password = ConvertTo-SecureString "$(PowerBIPassword)" -AsPlainText -Force
$credential = New-Object System.Management.Automation.PSCredential("$(PowerBIUser)", $password)
Connect-PowerBIServiceAccount -Credential $credential
# Run validation on PBIX files
Get-ChildItem -Path "$(System.DefaultWorkingDirectory)" -Filter "*.pbix" -Recurse | ForEach-Object {
Write-Host "Validating $($_.FullName)"
Test-PowerBIReport -Path $_.FullName -OutFile "$($_.BaseName)_validation.json"
# Check for major issues
$validationResult = Get-Content "$($_.BaseName)_validation.json" | ConvertFrom-Json
if ($validationResult.issueCount -gt 0) {
Write-Warning "Issues found in $($_.Name): $($validationResult.issueCount)"
$validationResult.issues | ForEach-Object {
Write-Warning "- $($_.category): $($_.description)"
}
}
}
displayName: 'Validate Power BI Reports'
- stage: DeployToTest
dependsOn: Build
condition: succeeded()
jobs:
- job: DeployToTest
steps:
- task: PowerShell@2
inputs:
targetType: 'inline'
script: |
# Connect to Power BI Service
$password = ConvertTo-SecureString "$(PowerBIPassword)" -AsPlainText -Force
$credential = New-Object System.Management.Automation.PSCredential("$(PowerBIUser)", $password)
Connect-PowerBIServiceAccount -Credential $credential
# Deploy to test workspace
Get-ChildItem -Path "$(System.DefaultWorkingDirectory)" -Filter "*.pbix" -Recurse | ForEach-Object {
Write-Host "Deploying $($_.Name) to test workspace"
New-PowerBIReport -Path $_.FullName -WorkspaceId "$(TestWorkspaceId)" -ConflictAction CreateOrOverwrite
}
displayName: 'Deploy to Test Workspace'
- stage: UAT
dependsOn: DeployToTest
jobs:
- job: UserAcceptanceTesting
steps:
- task: ManualValidation@0
timeoutInMinutes: 4320 # 3 days
inputs:
notifyUsers: '$(UATApprovers)'
instructions: 'Please validate the deployed reports in the test workspace.'
displayName: 'UAT Approval'
- stage: DeployToProduction
dependsOn: UAT
condition: succeeded()
jobs:
- job: DeployToProduction
steps:
- task: PowerShell@2
inputs:
targetType: 'inline'
script: |
# Connect to Power BI Service
$password = ConvertTo-SecureString "$(PowerBIPassword)" -AsPlainText -Force
$credential = New-Object System.Management.Automation.PSCredential("$(PowerBIUser)", $password)
Connect-PowerBIServiceAccount -Credential $credential
# Deploy to production workspace
Get-ChildItem -Path "$(System.DefaultWorkingDirectory)" -Filter "*.pbix" -Recurse | ForEach-Object {
Write-Host "Deploying $($_.Name) to production workspace"
New-PowerBIReport -Path $_.FullName -WorkspaceId "$(ProductionWorkspaceId)" -ConflictAction CreateOrOverwrite
}
# Update app if needed
Update-PowerBIApp -AppId "$(AppId)" -WorkspaceId "$(ProductionWorkspaceId)"
displayName: 'Deploy to Production Workspace'
Data Quality Management
Data Quality Framework
Data quality management directly impacts business decision-making:
- Builds trust in analytics and increases adoption
- Prevents costly decisions based on inaccurate information
- Reduces time spent reconciling conflicting data sources
- Creates accountability for data quality throughout the organization
- Improves customer experience through accurate reporting
Data Quality Framework
Technical implementation of data quality management:
- Data profiling and validation rules implementation
- Automated quality checks in ETL processes
- Exception handling and remediation workflows
- Quality metrics and KPI dashboards
- Data quality dimensions: completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness
Data Quality Checks Example
-- Create a data quality monitoring table
CREATE TABLE data_quality_results (
check_id INT,
check_name VARCHAR(100),
table_name VARCHAR(100),
column_name VARCHAR(100),
check_date TIMESTAMP,
records_checked INT,
records_failed INT,
failure_percentage DECIMAL(5,2),
severity VARCHAR(20),
status VARCHAR(20),
details TEXT
);
-- Example data quality check procedures
-- 1. Check for null values in required fields
CREATE PROCEDURE check_null_values(table_name VARCHAR, column_name VARCHAR, severity VARCHAR)
LANGUAGE plpgsql
AS $$
DECLARE
total_records INT;
null_records INT;
failure_rate DECIMAL(5,2);
check_status VARCHAR(20);
check_id INT;
BEGIN
-- Generate a unique check ID
SELECT COALESCE(MAX(check_id), 0) + 1 INTO check_id FROM data_quality_results;
-- Count total records
EXECUTE format('SELECT COUNT(*) FROM %I', table_name) INTO total_records;
-- Count null records
EXECUTE format('SELECT COUNT(*) FROM %I WHERE %I IS NULL', table_name, column_name)
INTO null_records;
-- Calculate failure rate
IF total_records > 0 THEN
failure_rate := (null_records::DECIMAL / total_records::DECIMAL) * 100;
ELSE
failure_rate := 0;
END IF;
-- Determine status
IF null_records > 0 THEN
IF severity = 'CRITICAL' THEN
check_status := 'FAILED';
ELSIF failure_rate > 5 THEN
check_status := 'WARNING';
ELSE
check_status := 'PASSED';
END IF;
ELSE
check_status := 'PASSED';
END IF;
-- Record results
INSERT INTO data_quality_results (
check_id, check_name, table_name, column_name, check_date,
records_checked, records_failed, failure_percentage, severity, status, details
) VALUES (
check_id,
'NULL_CHECK',
table_name,
column_name,
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
total_records,
null_records,
failure_rate,
severity,
check_status,
format('Found %s null values out of %s records', null_records, total_records)
);
-- Raise exception for critical failures
IF severity = 'CRITICAL' AND null_records > 0 THEN
RAISE EXCEPTION 'Critical data quality check failed: % null values found in %.%',
null_records, table_name, column_name;
END IF;
END;
$$;
-- Example usage:
-- CALL check_null_values('customer_dimension', 'customer_id', 'CRITICAL');
-- CALL check_null_values('customer_dimension', 'email', 'WARNING');
Self-Service Governance
Self-Service Enablement
Effective self-service governance balances business needs:
- Accelerates time-to-insight without sacrificing quality
- Empowers business users while maintaining consistency
- Reduces IT bottlenecks while ensuring proper controls
- Enables innovation while protecting enterprise assets
- Scales analytics capabilities throughout the organization
Self-Service Enablement
Technical implementation of self-service governance:
- Semantic layers with governed metrics and dimensions
- Content certification workflows for user-created dashboards
- Controlled data access through governed data sources
- Development sandboxes with appropriate guardrails
- Template and starter content libraries
Self-Service Governance Maturity Model
Dimension | Level 1: Ad-Hoc | Level 2: Repeatable | Level 3: Defined | Level 4: Managed | Level 5: Optimized |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data Access | Uncontrolled data extraction | Managed extracts with approval | Governed data sources | Self-service semantic layer | Context-aware data access |
Development | Unmanaged desktop tools | Shared development spaces | Template-based creation | Guided analytics development | AI-assisted development |
Certification | No certification process | Manual review process | Defined certification workflow | Automated validation checks | Continuous quality monitoring |
Education | Ad-hoc training | Formal training curriculum | Role-based certification | Embedded learning tools | Analytics mentorship programs |
Community | No collaboration tools | Discussion forums | Knowledge sharing platform | Cross-functional practice groups | Analytics champions network |
Training and Support
BI Education Program
Effective training programs deliver significant business results:
- Increases analytics adoption and return on BI investments
- Reduces support costs and reliance on specialized resources
- Improves data literacy across the organization
- Accelerates time-to-value for new analytics initiatives
- Creates a data-driven culture with better decision-making
BI Education Program
Technical implementation of training programs:
- Role-based learning paths with targeted content
- Hands-on labs and sandbox environments
- Documentation and knowledge base infrastructure
- Video tutorial production and hosting
- Certification and assessment frameworks
BI Support Model
BI Support Structure
Tiered support model for enterprise BI environments
Legend
Components
Connection Types
Measuring Governance Success
Governance Metrics
Governance metrics demonstrate business value and effectiveness:
- Quantifies return on investment in governance programs
- Identifies areas for process improvement
- Demonstrates compliance with regulatory requirements
- Tracks progress against data strategy objectives
- Builds support for continued investment in data governance
Governance Metrics
Technical implementation of governance metrics:
- Platform usage and adoption tracking
- Data quality monitoring dashboards
- Content certification rate tracking
- Performance and availability monitoring
- Security and compliance audit reporting
Key Performance Indicators for BI Governance
-
Adoption Metrics
- Active users per report/dashboard
- Self-service content creation rate
- Time spent in BI applications
- Report-to-user ratio
-
Quality Metrics
- Data quality score by dimension
- Error rate in certified content
- Time to identify and resolve data issues
- Content certification rate
-
Efficiency Metrics
- Average time to develop new reports
- Support ticket volume and resolution time
- Resource utilization (server, license)
- Content reuse rate
-
Value Metrics
- Decision time reduction
- Cost savings from consolidated efforts
- Business impact of analytics initiatives
- User satisfaction scores